2. In full view of the facts that there is no change in circumstances that differs from the original judgment and the punishment when the judgment was rendered, and that the defendant seems to have continuously operated the vehicle during the period in which he did not subscribe to the insurance, and that the defendant's age, occupation, and all other matters regarding the sentencing specified in the records of this case are determined to be appropriate, and thus the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition