When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who operates salt production business with the trade name “D” in the Southern-gun C, and the victim E is a person who leases salt farms from G to F and operates salt production business.

1. On January 21, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the traffic of the land by laying off five rocks equivalent to a radius of one meter in diameter on the above road on the ground that he/she used the above road owned by the Defendant without any compensation, in front of the Danan-gun, Newan-gun, Southern-gun, Seoul, without any compensation.

2. The Defendant interfered with the business of the victim by putting rocks on the roads at the time, time, and at the places specified in paragraph (1), prevented the victim E from entering the victim’s salt farms and salt storage warehouses, and by continuously preventing the victim’s salt from continuously leaving the sea waterways connected to the victim’s salt with rocks and soil, thereby interfering with the production of salt by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. The decision of provisional disposition on waterway use, the decision of the first civil panel in the Gwangju District Court, the air carrier of national land information sources, the field photographs of general traffic obstruction, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (the I currency for the staff of HMyeon Office in the Newanan-gun

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and Articles 185 and 314 (1) of the Criminal Act that choose a penalty: Selection of a fine;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;