A. Defendant A (misunderstanding of facts) did not have made a statement of the same content as that stated in the instant facts charged.

B. Defendant B (misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of the legal doctrine) did not have made a statement to K on the same content as the facts charged in the instant case, and even if such a statement was made, there is no possibility of spreading it, and the Defendant is not guilty.

2. Determination

A. The court below rejected Defendant A’s assertion and found Defendant guilty on the grounds as stated in the judgment below. In full view of the evidence duly adopted and investigated and the circumstances presented by the court below, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and there is no error of law by mistake of facts as alleged by the Defendant.

B. Defendant B rejected Defendant’s assertion and convicted Defendant of charges on the grounds as stated in the lower judgment. In full view of all the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court and the circumstances presented by the lower court, the lower court’s judgment is just and acceptable, and there is no error of misunderstanding of facts or of misunderstanding of legal principles as alleged by the Defendant.

3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.