beta
(영문) 청주지방법원충주지원 2019.11.29 2019가단21319

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

According to the statements in Gap 1 and 8-17, I completed the registration of ownership transfer on December 16, 1939 with respect to 1,537 square meters (hereinafter "the land in this case"). I died on December 13, 1968, and I died on December 13, 1968, and the Defendants were the successors of I, and the inheritance shares are the same as the inheritance shares in the attached sheet and the inheritance shares.

Plaintiff’s assertion

The plaintiff purchased the land of this case around 1949 by the plaintiff's referring around 1949 as the ground for the claim of this case

6. 25. Around January 20, 1979, the Plaintiff was unable to complete the registration of ownership transfer due to war, and the Plaintiff was donated the instant land from J on January 20, 1979 and continuously occupied the instant land from around that time. As such, the period of prescription for the acquisition of possession of the instant land was completed on or around January 20, 199, the Plaintiff sought implementation of the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer on January 20, 199 against the Defendants, who are the heir of I, the owner of the instant land.

Judgment

Therefore, it is not sufficient to recognize the possession of the Plaintiff solely on the basis of each of the statements from January 20, 1979 to January 20, 199 as to whether the Plaintiff continued possession of the instant land for 20 years, and the statements from January 20, 199, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the above assertion cannot be accepted without any need to further examine the remainder.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit.