When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No one may intermediate a third party's communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator, or provide such services for communications of a third party.

Nevertheless, on January 11, 2017, the Defendant was aware of a c mobile phone sales store located in Si/Gu, Si/S.A. in order to repay borrowed money from his/her male-gu, the Defendant was aware of a c mobile phone sales store that he/she had become aware of. The Defendant opened the mobile phone under the condition of financing for the use of the mobile phone service, which is not for the purpose of using the mobile phone service, and opened the mobile phone model name, color, and appearance of the mobile phone model necessary for committing the crime to contact with the F. of counseling staff of the specialized company D (total book E) and opened the 7 mobile phone number in the “G number.”

In addition, at around 14:00 the following day, the Defendant opened a cell phone sales and an additional opening in front of the Haban Haban Haban Habro, the Defendant entered the above sales store and opened a H(28 3, South) for disposal co-ordination, prepared an application for access to the KT moving, and opened a son 7 mobile phone via I’s number, and opened the son 7 mobile phone outside the air.

He transferred to H and received 1.2 million won in his name corporate bank account (J) and sold to H for telecommunications by using telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copy of each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police to E and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a list of offenses committed by good offices E and accomplices;

1. Article 97 of the relevant Act and Articles 97 and 30 of the Telecommunications Business Act concerning criminal facts as well as the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is seriously reflected in the order of provisional payment, and the former male-gu at the request of the former male-gu.