beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2019.05.24 2019고단305

야간건조물침입절도등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2019 Highest 305"

1. At night, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft against vehicles parked in the underground parking lot of an apartment complex in a large complex; (b) on December 7, 2018, the Defendant: (c) went into the top door of the victim D’s spoke-type car parking lot B in the Manyang-gu, Mayang-gu, Mayang-gu; and (d) went into the second floor of the apartment C-dong apartment parking lot; and (c) stolen the cash amounting to KRW 3.80,000,000 owned by the victim, which was parked in the contact settlement.

2. On December 27, 2018, the Defendant: (a) opened a car driver’s seat in front of the E apartment parking lot in the military, Mapo-si, Mapo-si; (b) opened a car driver’s seat in the victim F, which was parked in an unlocked state; and (c) stolen the cash amounting to KRW 190,000,000 owned by the victim on the wall in the vehicle.

"2019 Highest 367"

3. On January 1, 2019, in soup, soup, the Defendant posted a sales letter stating, “Once deposited KRW 70,000,00,000 to sell 20 KKg of the steel source, by accessing the Internet G app,” and reported the sales letter to the victim H that “on deposit KRW 70,000,000, the Defendant would deliver 20 Kg rice.”

However, the defendant did not have rice and did not have the ability to send rice even if he received deposit from the victim H.

Nevertheless, the Defendant deceiving the victim as above and transferred KRW 70,00 to the I account (J) in the name of the Defendant from the victim H on the same day, by deceiving the victim K in the same manner as in the same day, and transferred KRW 40,000 from the victim K in the same manner as in the same manner. On January 2, 2019, the three indictments were written to the victim L in the form of "rice," but according to the adopted evidence, the Defendant could recognize the fact of deceiving the victim L to read "three copies," and even if corrected, it cannot be deemed that the correction would interfere with the Defendant's exercise of the right to defense. Thus, it shall be corrected ex officio.

the victim. The victim is a false statement that he/she sells.