However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant: (a) on December 27, 2017, at around 21:20, who was investigated by a private victim E on the ground that the victim does not take the victim’s horse; (b) on the ground that he was investigated by a private person E in the border belonging to the D District of the Singu Police Station D District of the Singu Police Station, the Defendant: (c) who received the notification from the private person, received the notification and received the notification from the private person; (d) how much he received the notification; and (e) how much he received the notification from the victim;

Police Bags still burged;

Chewing strings and only strings shall be installed.

"Publicly insulting the victim by taking a bath in a large scale."

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, on December 27, 2017, on the ground that the above E does not take his horse at the place indicated in paragraph 1, around December 27, 2017, the Defendant carried in hand the breath of the above E, thereby sphering off several times, and carried in hand a part of the above E’s name.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion by the Defendant at the time of committing the instant crime, the Defendant did not memory under the influence of alcohol.

However, according to the records, the defendant's drinking at the time of committing each of the above crimes is acknowledged. However, considering the circumstances and the result of this case, the defendant's behavior before and after each of the above crimes, it cannot be seen that the defendant did not have or lacks ability to discern things or make decisions. Thus, the above assertion cannot be accepted.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of public duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the defendant's error)