However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date of the final judgment.

At around 18:40 on October 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) 4, a customer, who was drunk in a D cafeteria operated by the Hongcheon-gun B Victim C (Age 44, n, n) and had meals at the D cafeteria, she fluencing the disturbance of the Defendant flucing four customers at the D cafeteria, with a large interest of “flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium; and (b) the Defendant flusium flusium flu

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Investigation into telephone conversations of wooders E);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and community service order is two times the same criminal records to the defendant, and there are favorable circumstances such as unfavorable circumstances such as the failure to agree with the victim until now, and the expression of reflective intent while committing the instant crime, and there is no record of punishment heavier than the fine until now. In such circumstances, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account all the circumstances shown in the argument process of the instant case, including the character and conduct of the defendant, the environment, etc.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.