However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

"2016 Highest 714"

1. On March 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 21:00, the Defendant provided four victims, etc., including the victim C, who became aware of a mobile phone display “E” restaurant located in Masan-si, Masan-si; (b) provided meals to the victim, and provided a false statement of KRW 50,000 in cash.

However, in fact, the defendant received money from the injured party and did not pay a food for him, but did not pay it.

The defendant obtained 50,00 won from the damaged person to receive 50,000 won for food.

2. On May 1, 2016, at around 05:20, the Defendant issued an order to pay the alcohol value to the victim I, who became aware of the victim G operation on the F2th floor in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, F2, with the victim I, who came to know through the cell phone fix “Seoul Stockholm” on the day, and issued an order to pay the alcohol value in a normal manner, as if he would pay the alcohol value and two entertainment visitors.

However, in fact, the defendant calculated the drinking value from the victim I, and did not pay the drinking value in advance, and did not pay it.

The defendant acquired 120,000 won from the victim I to receive 120,000 won as the drinking value, acquired 15,000 won as the market price of beer G from the victim G, and acquired 60,000 won as the service fee for entertainment reception workers, and did not pay 60,000 won.

"2017 Highest 97"

1. On October 1, 2016, the Defendant is liable for the remainder of KRW 70,000,00,000, to the victim M who became aware of the victim K through the victim K operation in Changwon-si J of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and smartphone hosting fluor, “Uh Stockholm,” at the drinking price, to the victim M. who became aware of through the victim K operation in Changwon-si, Changwon-si.

In addition, we ordered the victim K to pay the normal drinking value as if they would pay the drinking value, and the alcohol and the alcohol.

However, the defendant received money in advance from the victim M in the name of the drinking value, and then K.