1. Forgery and uttering of securities;

A. On May 20, 2010, the Defendant: (a) stated C, the Defendant’s employee of the Defendant, “A”, “B”, “B”, “B”, “B”, “B” in the address column, “B”, and “B” as “B” on May 20, 2010, as if the notary public lent money to “EJoint Law Office”, “B”, and “B”, “B”, “B” and “B” as of May 20, 2010 following the date of issuance, as if the notary public were to lend money to “B” office, “B” and “B”, “B”, “B”, “B”, “B”, and “B” as of May 20, 2010.

Accordingly, the Defendant, without authority, forged a promissory note in F in the name of a limited liability company, which is a securities.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and place as above, had the above C submit a forged promissory note as above to an employee in charge of the notarial acts belonging to the EDR office, who is aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised forged securities.

2. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. At the same time and place as mentioned in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant stated C and the above notary public as “F of a limited liability company” in the issuer column, “F of a limited liability company”, “F of a limited liability company, “F representative director G of a limited liability company,” “A” in the payee column, “A”, and “A” and “B” in the payee column, without obtaining the said G’s permission, for the purpose of exercising the said G’s seal impression in the proxy form, which the said notary public and the above notary public received in advance the corporate seal impression from the limited liability company F in the manner described in the preceding paragraph.

Accordingly, the defendant, without authority, forged a letter of proxy in the name of the limited liability company F, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

(b).