사기
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is D, and the defendant is not related to the charges of this case. The court below found the defendant guilty of all of the charges of this case by misunderstanding the facts (the defendant submitted an appeal only for the reason of appeal that he had filed an appeal because he did not accurately memory for a long time, but only because he had a considerable amount of memory, but he did so, the court below held that the defendant maintained his argument in the written opinion submitted by the court below). 2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① the defendant made an investment in the company of this case operated D from the company of this case, which was operated by D, the foreign village of the defendant, around July, 2006, after investing the amount of KRW 63 million, invested in the company of this case to operate the company of this case from September 206, and made the defendant operate the company of this case to replace the company of this case with the defendant who was an employee of this case. < Amended by Act No. 7879, Mar. 3, 19, 20007>
In full view of the facts stated in the judgment below, the defendant can be found to have been actually operated by the company of this case from September 2006. According to the above evidence, the defendant could be fully convicted of having acquired property benefits equivalent to the amount of the above amount by deceiving the victims while operating the company of this case in which the defendant is engaged in the business of arranging travel and arranging marriage as stated in the facts constituting a crime in the judgment below, and by not paying the expenses for taking pictures of marriage, travel, marriage Alba, marriage lending, etc., and thus, the defendant's mistake is without merit.
3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is without merit and Article 364 of the Criminal Procedure Act is not reasonable.