1. Judgment on the Defendant’s grounds of appeal

A. As to the grounds of appeal Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5, the lower court: (i) the National Institute of Scientific Investigation designated the instant light, etc. as the first point of combustion; (ii) the Korean Fire Investigation Institute presented its opinion that there is no inconsistency in the process of determining the cause of the outbreak of the instant fire; and (iii) the shape of the anti-explosion may be verified relatively considerably considerably in comparison with the anti-explosion of the instant light lamps, etc.’s anti-explosion; and (iv) even if it was difficult to be formed by external flame infection in the instant light system; and even if it was affected by external flame, it appears that some alterations were made after the electrical melting of the instant light, etc.; and (v) the instant light, etc. was made of a waterproof structure, but the structure itself was prevented from being discharged from the outside; and (vi) the formation of the instant fire or exploitation engine, etc., excluding the form of the instant light parts, etc., by means of fire or explotion.