국가인권위원회권고결정취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff in the trial does not differ significantly from that of the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's assertion even if the statement of Gap evidence Nos. 37 through 60 (including all of the serial numbers) submitted in the court of first instance was newly examined, it is recognized as legitimate.
Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is consistent with the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for a partial dismissal of the judgment of the first instance as follows, and an addition of the following Paragraph (2). Thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
C. Foods
(a) treat “the cause” in Chapter 6 as “the cause”;
(b) the 9th page “(2)” as “(3)”, and the 16th page “16” as “16,38”; and
C. The 5th page of the 10th page “,” was “, but the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking the revocation of the removal from position by the Incheon District Court 2015Guhap52184, and the lawsuit was finalized on March 31, 2016 by the Plaintiff winning the lawsuit.”
The 12th part of the 8th part is "self-reliance," and the 10th part of the 11th part is "a conversation with the Plaintiff at the time of restraint, etc." respectively, and "a conversation with the Plaintiff at the time of restraint, etc." respectively.
(e) directly improving “direct” in Chapter 13 as “direct from the Plaintiff”;
(f) The 36th 5th 5th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. 6, 6th e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e
(g) “B” was expressed as “B” that the 18th page was “.”