However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On January 2, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking) at the port branch of the Daegu District Court in Daegu District Court on January 2, 2009, and a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same crime at the same court on May 3, 2010, respectively.

On June 21, 2018, at around 05:45, the Defendant driven a D-hand car with alcohol content of about 2km from around 02km to the front road located in the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, to the front road located in the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Seoul-si, with alcohol content of 0.126%.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition on drinking at least twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person engaging in driving service of a motor vehicle with Dials.

On June 21, 2018, at around 05:45, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol, and driven it along the five-lane road in C in the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Muwon-si, with one-lane road from the middle distance to the main office of the traffic along the Gyeongnam-si.

At the same time, the Defendant had a duty of care to care in advance to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering gear, steering gear, and brakes for those engaged in driving service, as the Defendant followed the Fwing and Francing of the Victim E (73 S) driving in the same direction.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to do so and neglected to do so, brought about the part of the victim's vehicle behind the Defendant's vehicle in front of the Defendant's vehicle in front of the signal waiting.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as cerebral celebin, which does not have any wound in the two mains in need of medical treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E: 1.1.