2. It is recognized that the Defendant’s mistake is divided and the Defendant’s health status appears to be not good.

However, the crime of this case prevents the defendant from providing emergency medical services by assault or threat of force, burns an object belonging to his own possession by negligence and causing public danger, and its nature is not very good. The defendant repeats the crime of this case again during the period of repeated crime resulting from the same crime despite several times of violence and the same criminal records; the frequency of the violation of the Emergency Medical Service Act reaches three times; damage or agreement has not been restored or reached up to the depth; and other factors of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, are considered, and thus, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.