The Plaintiff and the Defendants are co-owners of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”); Defendant B owned 3/11 shares; and the Plaintiff and the remaining Defendants owned 2/11 shares, respectively.

Until the closing date of the instant case, no agreement was reached between the Plaintiff and the Defendants on the method of dividing each of the instant real estate.

[Ground of recognition] According to the above facts acknowledged as a co-owner of the claim for partition of co-owned property in this case, the plaintiff, who is a co-owner of the real estate in this case, may file a claim for partition of the real estate in this case against the defendants, other co-owners pursuant to Article 269(1)

In full view of the various circumstances revealed in the pleading process, such as the entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the appraisal result of the Korea Appraisal and Korea Appraisal and Information Corporation, the share ratio between the plaintiff and the defendants as to the real estate of this case recognized by the purport of the whole pleadings, the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendants, the location, form, size, use relation, etc. of the real estate of this case, it is reasonable to divide each of the

In conclusion, we decide to divide the instant real estate between the Plaintiff and the Defendants in the same manner as the Disposition. It is so decided as per Disposition.