However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 03:00 on January 14, 2017; (b) No. D 201, the residence of the Defendant in Yansan-gu, Seoul-si; and (c) No. 1, E, who is a woman living together, and fighting with E, provides the Defendant with a Handphone.

The phrase “,” refers to the police officer’s g of the F District Zone G of the F District District of the Jeonsan Police Station, who was reported to the site by 112 and dispatched from the site, and to the said E with a view to holding the said G, and slope H, and the police officer’s b, “Stbb w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w h

c. Dop nb k walk

Haba Rabar in the inside of the river;

C. Carbres

“C” means a bath, putting one empty bottled, which is a dangerous object in the place, putting it up on the floor of the room, putting it up, breaking a slope H to this end, putting it up one time, putting it up on the part of the above H with arms, and placing one other empty small-scale disease, which is a dangerous object continuously. “C”

Bagh Bab

At this house, the term “Chob far” was expressed, thereby threateninging the above police officers as if they were.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H, G, and E;

1. Investigation report (on the spot, the state of arrival at the site, the body of the suspect, the body of the suspect, and the relation with deadly weapons);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each photograph, 112 report processing statement;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 144(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The prosecutor aggravated concurrent crimes did not explicitly indicate the provisions of Articles 37 and 38 of the Criminal Act regarding concurrent crimes under the applicable law of the indictment, but examining the facts charged or the overall records of evidence in the indictment, the contents of the instant case are that the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties by assault or intimidation against police officers G and H, and that such aggravated concurrent crimes should be aggravated as above.

Article 37 (former part) of the Criminal Code.