(a) Project approval and public announcement (1) Project approval: Project approval and public announcement (2) of a project to create a golf course in the same village (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): Defendant Company; < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 22420, Oct. 22, 2010>

나. 충청북도 지방토지수용위원회의 2011. 8. 30.자 수용재결(이하 ‘수용재결’이라 한다) (1) 수용대상물 및 보상금 ㈎ 원고 A 소유의 별지 제1목록 기재 제5부터 7번 토지(이하 3필지를 통틀어 ‘이 사건 토지’라 한다) : 보상금 합계 34,029,300원 ㈏ 별지 제1목록 기재 각 토지에 있는 원고 A 소유의 지장물(사과나무 9년생 1,050주, 대추나무 9년생 70주, 감나무 20년생 2주, 철지주대 1,050개) : 보상금 합계 131,776,500원 ㈐ 별지 제2목록 기재 각 토지에 있는 원고 B 소유의 지장물(복숭아나무 9년생 120주, 철지주대 60개) : 보상금 합계 12,408,000원 (2) 수용개시일 : 2011. 10. 30. 다.

On April 6, 2012, the Defendant Commission (hereinafter “Objection”) filed an objection with the Defendant Commission on the ground that the Plaintiff excluded the land listed in the attached Table 1 list from subject to expropriation or raised compensation in accordance with the reality, and the Plaintiff B filed an objection against the Defendant Commission on April 6, 2012, alleging that the amount of farming compensation for the long-term brain ginseng cultivated from the land listed in the attached Table 2 should be paid to the land in the attached Table 2, and the compensation for other obstacles should be raised in accordance with the reality. However, the Defendant Commission did not have any ground to deem the approval of the instant project as void as of April 6, 2012, and the land planting long-term brain ginseng was not subject to compensation because the Plaintiff illegally occupied the long-term brain ginseng while illegally occupying it without a legitimate title, and the compensation for the remaining obstacles was reasonable in the expropriation ruling.

(2) An appraisal corporation: a dialogue appraisal corporation, and