When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who operates the “D” in the official city C.

The owner of a business establishment harmful to juveniles shall not employ a juvenile, and the owner of a business establishment harmful to juveniles shall verify the age of the juvenile in advance when he/she intends to employ the employee.

Nevertheless, from July 22, 2014 to July 28, 2014, the Defendant employed an entertainment drinking house, which is a business establishment harmful to juveniles, without verifying the age of E (F.I.) as a juvenile, and violated this.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (including details of receipt of a written accusation);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense and Articles 58 subparagraph 4 and 29 (1) of the Juvenile Protection Act (the selection of fines, the defendant's history of having been sentenced to criminal punishment of fines on eight occasions due to the crime of injury in the past, etc., the legislative intent of the Juvenile Protection Act, the period of service and form of work of juveniles, the degree of administrative disposition,

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.