beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.08.22 2018고단2229

공용물건손상등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 5, 2018, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) was boarding a taxi operated by the injured party B in the light lighting distance located in the optical-dong when light lighting is light, and arrived at the front of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, and (b) was requested from the injured party to pay the taxi fee.

“.........” and without good cause, a taxi fee of KRW 7,00 has not been paid.

2. The Defendant who damaged public goods is arrested in a flagrant offender on April 5, 2018 on the grounds as set forth in the foregoing paragraph (1) and was on board the E- Abspurged police vehicle on the grounds of the foregoing paragraph, and was in motion for the Defendant to board the E- Abpurged police vehicle, and under the influence of alcohol, “Chewing flag. fe. f. f. f. f. f. f. f

"............" The police vehicle, which is an object used by public offices, was damaged by the repair cost of the above police vehicle, by walking the front seat window of the above police vehicle at a number of times, and walking the 10CM length is defective.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of B and F;

1. Receipts:

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to patrol pictures;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 141(1) (a) (a point of damage to public goods) of the Criminal Act, Article 3(1)39 (a) of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (a point of non-standing) and the choice of a fine for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act: the Defendant has been subject to a five-time fine due to a violent crime before 2012.

The damage has not been restored to the unpaid taxi and damaged public goods.

The favorable circumstances: the defendant recognized the crime and reflects the mistake.

There is no history of criminal punishment after 2012.

As above, the defendant's age, sexual conduct, motive, background, means and consequence of the crime, as well as other circumstances unfavorable to the defendant.