However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

At around 22:00 on June 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around the toilets of the “F” restaurant in Young-gu, Young-gu; (b) on the part of the victim G (20 years of age) who is a social work personnel member, did not recognize him/her as his/her appointment; and (c) collected beer’s disease, which is a dangerous thing that he/she had taken to the other ties; and (d) caused injury to the victim, such as a neck, dypine, dypology, and dypology, which require approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police statement of G and H;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victims;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The following facts are acknowledged, even though the defendant was diagnosed by the mental disorder of the defendant and his/her defense counsel on September 201, 201, such as the mental disorder of activity and caution, other shock disorder, and depression disorder, and psychological treatment, and the defendant was conducted thereafter. However, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, i.e., the defendant's behavior, method, method and circumstance of the crime, circumstance after the crime, attitude of the defendant at the investigative agency, etc., the defendant did not have the ability to discern things or make a decision, taking into account the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court.

Inasmuch as it seems that the defendant and his/her defense counsel were in a state or weak condition, the defendant and his/her defense counsel cannot be accepted.

The reason for sentencing [Scope of Recommendation] In light of the mitigated area (1 year and six months to two years) (1 year and six months) (special mitigation) of the mitigation area (1 year and six months to six months) of habitual injury, repeated injury, and special injury, the defendant's criminal act may be cut down.