Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

At around 14:20 on July 18, 2008, the Defendant: (a) provided that “D” restaurant operated by the Victim C in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and run a business, and (b) provided 38 minutes of meals on Sundays on July 17, 2008, the preceding day to that effect; (c) provided that “The Defendant provided 40,000 won of the taxi and the goods to be purchased to the victim, who borrowed money from the victim, did not wish to pay it.” (d) provided that “The Defendant received 40,000 won of the taxi and the goods to be purchased from the victim, who borrowed money from the victim.” (d) provided that “The Defendant received 40,000 won of the cash from the victim and received it from the victim.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;