The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of the primary charges of this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the appeal did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

In addition, the lower court, based on its stated reasoning, has “special circumstances in which personal information shall not be disclosed”

The judgment of the first instance court ordering the disclosure and notification of information on the defendant for a period of five years. In light of the purport and records of the relevant provisions of law, such measures of the court below are justified, and there is no error as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.