성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B around July 31, 2018, from E (the detention on June 23, 2019) that operates the business of the Damaa branch in the Dama branch in the So-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, to take over the said business in KRW 200 million, and on the same day, E paid KRW 100 million as the down payment, and the remainder is paid later, and the remainder is paid at the same time as E, and the said business was jointly operated.
Accordingly, Defendant B and E had the joint unemployment of the said business establishment, Defendant A had the lower office of the said business establishment, and Defendant A and F (the custody indictment of June 4, 2019) had the head of night office, and Defendant A and F had been punished instead of the owner of the business at night, and in return, Defendant A and F had the duty to receive KRW 3.5 million per month, and F had the duty to receive KRW 4 million per month.
1. The Defendants conspired with E and F, from August 2018 to the end of December of the same year (the Defendant A from August 20, 2018 to the end of December of the same year; the F from August 2018 to the end of the same year); and the F from August 2018 to November 2018 to the inside of the business place, provided that, in collusion with the said E and F, the Defendants engaged in sexual traffic by having male customers receive KRW 130,000 in the price for sexual traffic, and arranging sexual traffic with female customers by providing them with a shower facility to the inside and outside of the business place.
2. After December 2018, Defendant A paid the balance of KRW 100 million to Defendant B instead of Defendant B, and the Defendants conspired to jointly operate the said business.
Defendants conspired to commit the same year from January 1, 2019.
6. By October, 190, the establishments listed in paragraph 1 arranged sexual traffic by the same method as above.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements 1.