However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 28, 2017, from around 03:17 to around 03:50 the same day, the Defendant opened a driver’s seat not corrected for CK7 vehicle parked by the victim B at the front parking lot of the building “Y7 vehicle 131,” which was located in the front of the building “Y7 vehicle 131,” and stolen the property worth KRW 200,000,000,000, which was the victim’s ownership in the vehicle container 20,000,000 won, and 4,000,000,000,000 won in total at the market.

2. On September 28, 2017, at night, the Defendant: (a) opened a closed door at the “F cafeteria” operated by the victim E in Thai-si, Thai-si on September 28, 2017; and (b) operated a small credit cooperative on which the Defendant entered the said restaurant.

As a result, the Defendant, at night, stolen the total amount of KRW 263,00,00, including 10,000,000, KRW 100 of the market price of the victim's building and 263,000,000, KRW 1,000,000, KRW 1,000,000, 263.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and B;

1. Report on internal investigation (the detection of a suspected criminal act and the confirmation of the same line);

1. CCTV photographs;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Photographs of seized articles;

1. Investigation reports (Attachment, such as site photographs), site photographs, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a report on investigation (the confirmation of black stuffs and CCTVs around the place where the crime is committed), a black stuff photograph, etc.;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act (absurd point, a choice of imprisonment, or a punishment) concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 330 of the Criminal Act (a thief for intrusion on night buildings);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including the observation of protection and the order of community service, recognized by the defendant for each of the crimes of this case, the total amount of damage caused by each of the crimes of this case, and the damage caused by each of the crimes of this case, are returned.