When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 30, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the first instance court of the assault case No. 2015, 164, 300, and taken an oath in the court of support for the Si/Gu/Eup located in Si/Gu/Eup on May 15, 2016, and the Defendant appeared as a witness of the above court No. 2015, 164, and the prosecutor stated that “The witness thickness is a person who is the injured party by Defendant C’s appearance.”

I would like to ask "I will not".

말하자면 피고인이 발로 찼어요.

In the future, it has not been able to do so.

2. The prosecutor stated that “I have been aware of the person in question” and asked “I have been able to see” and “I have been able to see.

(3) The prosecutor stated that Defendant C was not able to catch, injure, or injure Defendant C’s item.

“Latherter” when asking questions;

80 200

4. The prosecutor stated that “When Defendant C was exposed to the victim, whether the victim was the victim?”

Albia Dozura

It is necessary to ask questions as "I am the same as "I am not fit."

He did not have received.

“The statement was made”.

However, on August 4, 2015, at around 08:55, the Defendant: (a) observed a satisfafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafaf fafafafafafafafafafafafafabba, and (b) observed D

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Copy of examination protocol of witness;

1. Copy of protocol concerning the examination of suspect C by the police; and

1. Copy of the police statement made to D;

1. A copy of F and G’s statement [the Defendant did not witness the fighting process of C and D in front of the building, and in the stairs that are going to the building, C showed the shoulder of D, but the head was unable to witness the dubing or dubing the dub, so the statement in the above court does not constitute a false fact contrary to memory.