A. The Defendant, as a private teaching institute with a large number of branch points in Gangnam-gu Seoul and Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, established a teaching field lecture mainly.

In addition to the establishment of the above lecture, the defendant has a management support room in charge of the finance of a private teaching institute, an editing room in charge of editing and producing school bills, and a counseling room in charge of counseling for students and parents.

B. From August 30, 2010, the Plaintiff served as an instructor from the Defendant and retired from the Defendant as of November 30, 2013.

(Plaintiff was present at the Defendant's high conference on November 27, 2013).

In general, from around 19:00 to around 19:00, the Plaintiff was subject to one lectures, from around 10:00 to about 3 lectures on Saturdays, and from around 09:00 to about 4 lectures on Sundays.

In addition to the lecture affairs, the plaintiff had engaged in the affairs related to the lecture, such as preparation of a class plan, preparation of a school proposal, and preparation of a written response to the question of question at the direction of the defendant, and the defendant also participated in various meetings, meetings, briefing sessions, etc. publicly notified by the defendant.

In particular, the plaintiff continued the business of the defendant's representative director at the early stage of joining the school and continued the business several times under the defendant's instruction that sees the law of lectures, etc.

The defendant decided the allocation of classes and the schedule of lecture hours for instructors including the plaintiff according to the operation plan formulated in advance, taking into account the lecture ability of instructors, the response of students, etc.

In addition, according to the defendant's instruction, the plaintiff received the transfer of the student in charge of another instructor.

E. The Defendant publicly announced the business-related matters or delivered instructions through the internal Internet bulletin board, various meetings, etc.

The defendant, in fact, solicited the general high schools to apply for the after-school essay lessons through a bulletin board, and the plaintiff was also in the E High School and the FF High School.

F. The plaintiff.