저작권법위반
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a professor and professor of D University Construction Engineering, E is a F University Construction College professor and G is a manager of the business of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government HI and the J for Publication of Books.
Defendant, E, as a co-work of K, L, M, and N from G around February 2015, Defendant, and E accepted the request for additional defects in the “O” book issued by I on March 10, 2010.
G on February 23, 2015, at the J Office for Publication of the said I and Books, the fact is that Defendant and E are not the author of the “O,” but the book was issued in the name of I, a so-called so-called “pro-called “pro-con” book added Defendant and E to the “P” mark and changed title from the book to the “O.”
Accordingly, the Defendant made the work public in collusion with E and G by indicating the real name of a person other than the author as the author.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement made by the witness G in the second public trial records;
1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect by each prosecutor against the defendant or E;
1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the written request for the production of seized books and a copy of the cover of the relevant books (pact No. 433);
1. Article 137(1)1 of the Copyright Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for criminal facts;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act
1. The assertion;
A. The Defendant did not receive a request from G to register the instant book additionally, and there is no fact that he did not consent to the request.
B. The Defendant did not know about the publication, etc. of the above book, and thus, the Defendant did not constitute a principal offender in collusion with G, etc., and thus did not constitute a joint principal offender.
(c)
Article 137(1)1 of the Copyright Act provides that “an act of making a work public under the real name or pseudonym of a person other than the author shall be punished.” Under the Copyright Act, the term “public title” refers to a work first made public or published in the public.