The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the court of first instance, the court below’s determination that the charged facts of this case were guilty on the grounds as stated in its reasoning is justifiable, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending

In addition, the argument that the defendant's act constitutes a justifiable act is not a legitimate ground for appeal since the defendant's ground for appeal or the court below did not consider it as a subject of judgment ex officio.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a fine is imposed against the defendant, the argument that the sentencing of the sentence

Other grounds of appeal by the defendant do not constitute legitimate grounds of appeal under Article 383 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.