When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. Intimidation;

A. On October 7, 2013, the Defendant asserted that at around 10:00 on October 7, 2013, the Defendant’s residence of the Defendant located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, the period of lease agreement between the victim D and telephone conversations is two years under the Lease Protection Act, and the lease agreement is continued.

The defective victim is able to pay a few percent of the fine.

Does there be a few percentage of fines at the office.

The victim threatened the victim, such as “”.

B. On October 7, 2013, the Defendant continued to maintain the lease agreement for the same reason at the same place as the above paragraph (a) around 15:00, and during telephone conversations with the victim D.

The defective victim is found in the attorney-at-law office working for the head of the party.

I would like to speak to the cryphos.

It shall not be a reply to the representative attorney-at-law, but it shall be considered that the representative attorney-at-law will not be well aware of this employee.

Ap. The same person shall be prohibited from working.

“In the end, the victim threatened the victim.”

2. Around March 19, 2014, the Defendant insultingd the Defendant: (a) around 11:50 on the street that was passed by many and unspecified people in front of the Seoul Central District Court located in Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court, Seocho-gu, Seoul; (b) on the street that the victim had a civil dispute with the victim, and (c) on the victim’s bit of bitch

”, “ 월세 사는 주제에, 변호사 사무장 주제에, 아무것도 모르는 주제에, 너가 뭘 안다고 이 자식 아”, " 똥보다 더러운 자식“ 이라고 큰소리로 말하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

3. Violence;

A. The Defendant committed assault, such as a larlar with the victim, who was aware of a dispute with the victim D at the time and place described in the above paragraph 2, with the victim D and the litigation problem.

B. The Defendant, around 10:00 on April 7, 2014, brought about a dispute on the ground that the victim D was entering the conciliation room before the Seoul Central District Court located in Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court located in Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul Central District Court, and that the victim D entered the conciliation room.