When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay taxi expenses even if he/she gets a taxi.

On November 24, 2017, the Defendant appeared to have taken advantage of the victim B's C taxi in the middle-dong located in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and had the victim operate the taxi before the exit 3rd in the Dobong-gu, Dobong-gu, Seoul, and acquired financial profits equivalent to KRW 8,800 from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. B written statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a taxi charge receipt;

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;