근로자퇴직급여보장법위반
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is the representative of C in Kimpo-si, who is a full-time employee engaged in the main manufacturing business by making use of his/her full-time employee, and the Defendant did not pay KRW 4,578,615 of his/her retired employee D retirement pay within 14 days from the date of his/her retirement without any agreement on the extension of the payment deadline.
2. Determination
(a) Applicable law: Article 44 subparagraph 1 of the Guarantee of Retirement Benefits of Workers, and Article 9 of the same Act;
(b) Crimes of non-violation of will: proviso to Article 44 of the Guarantee of Retirement Benefits of Workers.
C. On July 24, 2017, the filing of a petition on the same day as the purport that the above employee is not subject to punishment, which was subsequent to prosecution. D.
Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.