On August 8, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 07:25 around 07:25, the Defendant: (b) obstructed a correctional officer’s inspection of CCTV at the same time; (c) obstructed a correctional officer’s screen on the ground that the progress of the Cheongong-gun, Gyeong-do, 1 through Jinong-do, 1 through Jinong-do, 9-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu; and (d) removed a line flag of 47,000 won at the market price installed on the wall of the confinement room, which was 248,000 won at the market price; and (d) destroyed the line wind and TV, putting the winder at both sidess, and destroyed the toilet at the market price of 22.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement of reference witnesses;

1. A report on investigation (Evidence photographs and estimates);

1. Application of statutes on work reports;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts [the scope of recommending punishment] The basic area (from June to January) (the invalidation of public goods) of the first type of crimes (the invalidation of public goods) shall be sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months], and the defendant shall be sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime, and it is inevitable to sentence the defendant on the ground that the damage has not been restored.

However, the sentencing conditions shown in the records of this case and the theory of changes, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means, methods and results leading to the crime of this case, and the circumstances before and after the crime, shall be determined as ordered by considering the following factors.