However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 5, 2017, the Defendant driven a B Poter Cargo Vehicle around 18:08, and led to the front of the Daegu-gun road to the Sungcheon-ro.

In this case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to live well on the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to operate the vehicle safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while driving a bicycle on a yearly basis without neglecting this, was found late to find out the bicycle running ahead of the D(51) and was negligent in changing the bicycle rapidly, and received the rear part of the said bicycle as the front right side of the said cargo vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered an injury in the course of blood transfusion, etc. due to the above occupational negligence, where the number of days of treatment cannot be known to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and report on a traffic accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of imprisonment without prison labor for a crime;

1. The sentencing of Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act results in the serious consequence of injury during the crime of this case. Nevertheless, the defendant did not agree with the victim. Meanwhile, the defendant's consent to the crime of this case is against the defendant, and the victim's damage can be recovered due to the purchase of comprehensive insurance, and the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence, all other circumstances constituting the conditions for the sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, including the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered by the order.