When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On April 25, 2020, at around 17:50 on April 25, 2020, the Defendant damaged the victim’s glass which is equivalent to KRW 1.60,000 in the market price by destroying the Defendant’s female-friendly Gu and Si expenses, while putting the Defendant’s female-friendly Gu and Si expenses.

2. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 제 1 항 기재와 같은 날 18:00 경 같은 장소 앞 길가에서, ‘ 손님이 유리를 깼다.

“The” reported 112, F, a police officer of the House E District Police Station E District, who was a police officer of the Seocheon-si Police Station, used the Defendant to report and move on the floor to the Defendant, used the f to walk up on the floor, used the f to walk up, and used the f face to take place.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Written statement C of the police statement concerning F of the suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant who has made the legal statement of the defendant - On-site photographs (a damaged restaurant glass);

1. - Police Officer’s card (F) - Work log - 112 Report processing of the case - Police Officer’s fadicam facam - CD facam facam facam (victim’s facam, etc.) each investigation report (applicable law to the field, such as the situation at the time of arrival, the background leading up to the arrest of the suspect, etc., the confirmation of the damaged goods and the suspect’s estimate, non-payment of the victim’s facam, the

1. Relevant legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 366 of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment (a point of destruction), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with the performance of official duties) and each fine (a crime of this case is deemed to have been committed against police officers who were under the influence of the Defendant, who had destroyed the remaining restaurant glass and opened up on the road, who had been dispatched after receiving a report of 112 without any justifiable reason, and committed an assault by drinking a part of the face of police officers who have been dispatched after receiving a report of 112. In particular, the crime of this case is deemed to have a significant and significant social hazard as a typical major crime.