However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 08:00 on July 7, 2012, the Defendant: (a) took a dispute with the victim E (the 30-year old-old-gu) on the ground that the victim went against his/her obligation on his/her hand on the ground that the victim went against his/her obligation; (b) took care of the victim’s face; (c) took care of his/her hand on the part of the victim’s face; and (d) took care of his/her face with another hand when the Defendant took care of his/her face, the Defendant inflicted upon the victim’s head’s Da, which requires treatment for about 28 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A written diagnosis for injury (investigative records, No. 5 pages);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 257 (1) of the Election of Imprisonment or Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the defendant shall be punished strictly, but considering the fact that the defendant is against the defendant, the defendant is not in the same criminal record, the victim E cannot be deemed to have any responsibility for causing the crime of this case, and the fact that the defendant deposited three million won for the victim, etc., the punishment shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following: