2. Although there are favorable circumstances such as the confession and reflect of the defendant, considering the method and frequency, etc. of each of the crimes of this case, the crime is not good and the responsibility for the crime is grave, the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victims up to the depth of the trial, the defendant has been punished as a similar crime in the past, and there is no special reason to change the sentencing after the sentence of the judgment below, the scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court sentencing guidelines (from June to February 9) of the defendant, and other conditions of punishment as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., are considered, it cannot be deemed unfair because the court below's sentence is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.