If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

At around 22:00 on August 8, 2014, the Defendant found the victim E (Woo, 50 years of age) in front of D in Gwangju Mine-gu, and said, “I would like to see why I would use the remaining card without permission, and why I would like to see why I would like to see why I would like to see why I would like to see why I would like to see why I would like to see why I would like to see I would like to see I would like to see I would like to see I would like to see I would like to see I would like to me, I would like to see I would like to see that I would like to see the victim’s face that I would like to me to close I would like to me to close I would like to me, and that I would like to sing and sing down I would like to see how I would like to treat the victim for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Each police statement of E and F states that the statement of E and F contains only the E's appearance of E in the process of opening the door of the vehicle in which E and E were placed in the door without knowing the appearance of E due to the defect of E's car, and there is no door to open the door of E's appearance, and there is only a few fact to open the door of E's appearance into E's car, but they are not approved by E's own origin. The statements of E and F in each investigation agency and investigation agency are consistent, consistent with the facts charged, and are believed to be specific, and if E's appearance becomes a defect of the door of E's first time, it is reasonable to view it as the fact that E's appearance is not applied by the rule of experience to the defect of the E's appearance.

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;