If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant, in collusion with loan broker B, C, etc. who is not able to obtain a loan from a financial institution due to personal circumstances, concluded that he would receive a loan from an illegal loan.

C Despite the absence of the fact that the Defendant leased the D Building 2011 in Busan Young-gu, Busan, the real estate lease agreement that B et al. paid the deposit amount of KRW 50 million and leased the said house for 2 years, and the documents necessary for the loan, such as E employment certificate that B et al. received benefits and the certificate of the source of wage and salary income, etc., were made by falsely preparing the documents necessary for the loan, such as E and the certificate of the source of wage and salary income, and submitted the loan application to the employee in charge of the company bank who was aware of such circumstances, and applied for the loan.

Although the Defendant did not have concluded a lease contract with C, the Defendant prepared a false confirmation that the lease contract was made with C when the corporate bank loan was examined, and that corresponding month is the same month through employees in charge of the loan.

7. A beneficiary of a loan of KRW 30 million from a victim company bank.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Copy of the protocol of interrogation of the police as to B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on loan transaction agreement, copy of real estate lease contract, copy of employment certificate, copy of the confirmation of lease contract, and details of passbook transaction for C loans;

1. Article 347 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;