However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 9, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million from the Jeju District Court as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On June 29, 2020, at around 17:30, the Defendant driven a D SV truck in the state of alcohol 0.138% alcohol level from the front road of the lander in Jeju Island B to the C front intersection.

Accordingly, the defendant has driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol not less than twice in violation of the prohibition of drunk driving.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to public notice of criminal records, etc. of the report on his/her statement on the status of a prime driver, and copies of summary order;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The punishment as ordered is determined by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the purpose of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act was high in blood alcohol concentration; (b) the occurrence of accidents occurred; (c) the Defendant did not repeat for a long time; and (d) there was no record of punishment exceeding the fine for the same kind of crime; (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, environment, background and result of the crime; and (e) the circumstances shown in the arguments of this case