If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

At around 05:00 on March 24, 2012, the Defendant acquired stolen goods from D from May 19, 2012 in the same manner as written in Table 2 of the crime committed in attached Table 2, even though he/she knew that he/she had a 800,000,000 won of LG options cell phone in the vicinity of the main place of the main place of the main place of the main place in Gangwon-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police officer in relation to D, E, F, G, H, I, and J;

1. Application of each seizure protocol / List statute;

1. Relevant Article 362 of the Criminal Act and Article 362 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;