Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The Defendant is a motor vehicle dealer, who is a motor vehicle dealer, as the representative in the C Motor Vehicle Sales Complex.

A motor vehicle dealer shall not notify a person who inspects the performance and condition of a motor vehicle by fraud of the details of the inspection of the performance and condition of the structure, devices, etc. of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, on February 14, 2017, the Defendant notified the buyer of the record of the performance and condition inspection of the E-vehicle, which was falsely prepared three times from February 14, 2017 to May 29, 2017, including notification of the record of the performance and condition inspection prepared in a false manner to unspecified buyers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police in relation to F;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger of inspection of performance and condition of each motor vehicle, and the ledger of registration of each motor vehicle;

1. Article 80 of the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 80 subparagraph 7 of the Automobile Management Act and Article 58 (1) of the same Act concerning the selection of punishment, and the selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;