On November 29, 2014, the Defendant, at around 10:20 on November 29, 2014, stolen the gap in which the victim C reports other duties at the cash withdrawal time No. 118,000 won in cash withdrawal time at the Hongcheon-gun Branch, Hongcheon-gun Branch, Hongcheon-gun Branch, 118.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the witness C’s legal statement;

1. Protocol of partial police statement concerning C;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (CCTV image photograph);

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. A fine of 300,000 won for which the sentence is suspended; and

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. The meaning of a suspended sentence: A system which suspends the suspension of sentence for a specified period and is deemed to be acquitted after the specified period has elapsed;

Effect of suspension of sentence: it shall be considered to be acquitted after two years have elapsed from the date of receiving the suspension of sentence (Article 60 of the Criminal Act). Lapse of the suspension of sentence: The suspended sentence shall be imposed when a person who receives the suspension of sentence becomes subject to a judgment of suspension of qualifications or more severe punishment, or when

Article 61 of the Criminal Code. The reason for sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code is that the defendant has actively returned damaged goods, such as the victim’s phone call after the crime and informing his location after the crime, and the defendant has no record of criminal punishment, and the defendant seems not to be healthy, and the defendant appears to be in good health, and other circumstances, such as the defendant’s age, character and conduct, the environment, and the motive, means, and consequence of the crime of this case, which are the conditions for sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, shall be determined as ordered.

Parts of innocence

1. The Defendant of the facts charged is worth KRW 3.2 million at the time and place indicated in the facts charged as indicated in the judgment.