When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 15, 2014, at around 11:00, the Defendant was getting a skiing at a point of business GV-4 located in the middle upper level of the "Yyeong-gun Rental Park in Yongsan-do, Gangwon-do Olympic 715, GV-4.

In such cases, the defendant, as the defendant, has a duty of care to select slots suitable for the ski real force and maintain a safe speed, and to conduct the ski safely by checking the skis and the left and right in order to prevent the conflict with other users.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to neglect the front bank and the left-hand city and proceeded in the form of a swelved Swelve, but did not discover the victim D (the age of 46) who was unswelved from the left-hand side of the Defendant, and did not go beyond swelve to the left-hand side of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant suffered by negligence the injury of the victim, such as cage cage cage, which requires approximately six weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witness D and E each testimony;

1. A D medical certificate;

1. A witness report of the E accident and a field map of E in the name of the E;

1. Shortest internship course content Internet outputs;

1. A copy of the paper sent back by a DNA strawls, and photographs immediately after a DNA accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of the F Accident Report;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment. Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant's side asserts that the defendant's assertion of the defendant and defense counsel of the provisional payment order under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was caused by the victim's negligence before the accident of this case occurred and there was no negligence on the defendant.

However, in full view of the following circumstances revealed by the above evidence, the Defendant appears to have been at fault as stated in the facts charged with respect to the instant accident, and the instant accident occurred.