손해배상(자)
1. The Defendants jointly deal with the Plaintiff A with KRW 161,060,082, KRW 1040,054, and each of the above amounts.
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The facts of recognition 1) Defendant C driven a D taxi on November 26, 2014 on the 21:30, 2014, and parked the front stop line on the crosswalk for the signal waiting at the Seo-gu Gyeong-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu. 2) At that time, the network E (hereinafter “E”) was under the influence of alcohol, thereby blocking the driving of the said taxi while blocking the front of the taxi while the above crosswalk was under the influence of alcohol, thereby interfering with the driving of the said taxi. The passenger and the horse dispute with the passengers on the said taxi, who were on the said taxi, and Defendant C laid off the body of E from the said taxi in excess of the enclosed floor.
3) Defendant C operated the said taxi without cutting off E beyond its floor and leaving the said intersection. 4) After Defendant C left the said intersection, Defendant C driven a G cab (hereinafter “Ari-si”) and passed the said intersection to the left and the left at the above intersection, Defendant C was over the said crosswalk.
(5) On November 27, 2014, E died from brain damage at the Joseon University Hospital on November 27, 2014 (hereinafter “instant accident”). (6) The heir of E is the Plaintiff A and the children, who are the wife.
7) Defendant Association of Private Passenger Taxi Transportation Business (hereinafter “Defendant Association”)
(A) is an insurer which has entered into a mutual aid agreement for Aransi. [Reasons for Recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 7 and 8 (which has a serial number) are included; hereinafter the same shall apply).
3.3 5 1.3 1.3 1.
B. On the top of a board, the accident site of this case can be sufficiently anticipated that the vehicle could be driven by the vehicle only when the person goes beyond the floor of the road, so the defendant C was obligated to rescue the vehicle and move it to a safe place, in view of the above facts of recognition, if the vehicle used to go beyond the road floor by assaulting E, but the defendant C is obligated to rescue it and move it to a safe place.