However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 4, 2013, at around 22:00, the Defendant entered the said multi-house in front of the instant multi-house operated by the victim D(47 years of age) located in Gangwon-gun, Gangwon-gun, but the victim completed the business, took the entrance door to the locked victim, took a bath to the locked victim, breaking the door door, breaking the door door, and entered the said multi-house through the shoulder door space, and then, he saw the victim’s left part at one time in drinking.

As a result, the Defendant damaged the entrance glass equivalent to 50,000 won of the market price of the victim, and invaded on the structure managed by the victim, and caused approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Articles 366, 319 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant acknowledges and reflects the crime, the fact that it appears to be a contingent crime, and the fact that the defendant has no criminal record or heavier punishment);

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;