If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in a SP area.

On March 10, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 14:00, and proceeded at the speed of the city at the speed of the two-lanes between the two-lanes of the distance of the cargo terminal in the new ICT room in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Since there is a crosswalk where a vehicle signal apparatus has been installed, in such cases, there was a duty of care to keep the signal to the person engaged in driving service and to prevent the accident by properly examining whether there is a person who gets on the way.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and obtained pedestrian signals from the negligence of proceeding to the stop signal, and received the right side side of the victim D (Woo 20 years old) who opened the crosswalk from the right side to the left side, and received the front part of the vehicle of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as “influent salt influent sium,” which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of traffic accidents under DNA preparation;

1. A traffic accident report, a survey report, an investigation report (accident site and investigation of suspected vehicles), and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to copies of diagnosis certificates;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

3. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order shall be based on the road work situation in the site of the accident in this case, the installation condition of signal apparatus and painting, the form of crosswalk, etc., and the fact that the compensation has been paid to the victim by means of comprehensive insurance to which the defendant has joined, etc., and the punishment shall be