대여금반환 청구의 소
1. The defendant shall pay 385,00,000 won to the plaintiff and 2.5% per month from March 17, 2010 to the day of full payment.
Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the statements and arguments by Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 3 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff shall pay the remainder after deducting the interest for three months from the due date when the plaintiff lent 385,000,000 won to the defendant, Hyundai Forum, Hyundai Forum, and C (hereinafter "the defendant, etc.") on December 17, 2009 at the rate of 2.5% from March 16, 2010, and interest rate. The defendant, etc. shall be deemed to have agreed to jointly and severally pay the above loan principal and interest on the same day. Thus, the defendant shall be liable to pay to the plaintiff damages for delay calculated by the agreement of 385,00,000 won and the rate of 2.5% from March 17, 2010 on the following day.
(A) The plaintiff filed a claim for damages for delay from March 16, 2010, which is due date for payment, but the plaintiff's claim for damages for delay exceeding the above recognition scope is without merit, and thus, the plaintiff's claim for damages for delay exceeding the above recognition scope is without merit). Accordingly, the defendant's claim for damages for delay attached to Gap's certificate No. 1 (written performance) is made voluntarily sealed by Eul, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it, and in full view of the purport of Gap's statement and the whole arguments, the above evidence No. 1 (written performance) can be recognized as having been made by a notary public while the defendant was present directly in the law firm's law firm ratio office. Thus, the defendant'
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.