2. The judgment recognizes all of the crimes of this case by the defendant, and it is deemed that the defendant is a juvenile of 17 years of age who is the juvenile of this case, and it seems that the defendant has the record of being subject to a protective disposition and criminal punishment several times of the same crime, but the defendant has the record of committing each of the crimes of this case again during the repeated crime period, and the liability for the crime is not less exceptionally applied, the victims have not been recovered, and all of the sentencing factors in the arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, the circumstances after the crime of this case, etc., are considered to be unfair since the court below's punishment is too excessive. Thus, the above argument of the defendant is without merit.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.