2. The judgment of the court below is divided in depth with the defendant's mistake, and at the court below, the victim et al. expressed that the victim et al. would not want punishment by compensating the victim E of each crime of this case for all the amount of the crime of this case, and by agreement with the victim et al., and each crime of this case of this case is one of the concurrent crimes of this case after Article 37 of the Criminal Act with the judgment of the court below which became final and conclusive, and since the crime of this case of this case is one of the concurrent crimes of this case under Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act, the punishment should be determined in consideration of equity and criminal cases at the same time. However, the defendant had already been punished by imprisonment and fine for the same crime of this case at the time of each crime of this case at the time of each of the crime of this case, and the total amount acquired by the defendant amounts to 38 million won or more, taking into account the motive and circumstances leading up to each crime of this case, the defendant's age, age, sex, occupation, family relation, etc.

3. In conclusion, the Defendant’s appeal is without merit, and the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Provided, That the Defendant’s appeal is corrected to correct it ex officio in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, since it is clear that he/she will hold office in September 9, 201 as of September 2 of the facts constituting the crime of the lower judgment.